Show Archives
Listen Live And Chat
About
You are here: Home
/ Inside Job: Seven Questions About 9/11
Inside Job: Seven Questions About 9/11
Commentary // Jul 5 2011
Listen To The Bob Tuskin Radio Show Weekdays 8 to 10pm EST.
Seven Questions about 9/11
Jim Fetzer
As a former Marine Corps officer (1962-66), who spent his 35-year career offering courses in logic, critical thinking, and scientific reasoning to college students, it troubles me when my government appears to be lying to the American people. On this 4th of July, therefore, I want to share with you some of the questions that have arisen in my mind about the events of 9/11, which have been used to justify wars in Iraq and Afghanistan at enormous cost in lives lost and resources expended. I don’t claim to have all of the answers, but here are some of my questions—seven for the 4th of July!
(1) The early explosions
In their study, “Seismic Proof: 9/11 was an inside job”, Gordon Ross and Craig Furlong (one an engineer, one a numerical analyst) present evidence that there were enormous explosions in the subbasements of both of the Twin Towers prior to the impacts of any planes on those buildings. They used extremely reliable data from a geological laboratory run by Columbia University and radar and FAA data to come to the conclusion that those explosions occurred 14 and 17 seconds before those planes hit the towers:
My first question, therefore, is how were those 19 Islamic terrorists able to arrange these explosions, which drained the water from sprinkler systems that would have otherwise extinguished the rather modest office fires that remained after the jet fuel was consumed in those spectacular fireballs? I have given this a lot of thought and I can’t figure out how they did that.
(2) The impossible entry
We have all seen the footage of Flight 175 hitting the South Tower, which is the only reasonably distinct video coverage we have of any of the four plane crashes. There are plenty of copies of the Michael Hezarkhani video, which was taken more or less from the side, and still others of the Evan Fairbanks video, which was taken looking straight up the side of the South Tower. I have been puzzled, when I have taken a closer look, the plane actually enters the buildings without crumpling, without losing its wings or tail, and with no bodies, seats, or luggage falling to the ground. Here’s what I mean:
The problem I have is that, as a student of physics in high school and college, I learned that the impact of a moving plane impacting with a stationary building should create the same effects as those of a moving building impacting with a stationary plane. We would not expect a car crashing into an enormous tree to disappear into the tree. My question is, absent the suspension of the laws of physics on 9/11, how could this occur?
(3) The sizing problem
Perhaps because of my military background, I have found the Pentagon attack of special interest. The Department of Defense originally released five frames instead of any of the more than eighty (80) videos that would have captured exactly what happened. Although three of those videos have subsequently been released, none of them shows more about the crash than those original five, four of which show the spectacular fireball, the other the somewhat obscure image just above the gate mechanism that is conveniently labeled “plane”. It looked too small to me. So I asked a friend of mine—who is better at these things than am I—if he could size the image of a Boeing 757 to the tail shown in the frame that the Pentagon had released:
Imagine my surprise when it turned out that Flight 77 should have been more than twice the size of the plane in the Pentagon’s own frame. So my third question is, why isn’t the plane in the image the size of a Boeing 757?
(4) The lack of debris
Although many Americans are unaware, the hit point on the Pentagon is on the ground floor. There is a hole about 10’ high and 16-17’ wide, which is surrounded by a chain-link fence, two enormous spools of cable and a pair of cars, where there are unbroken windows beside and above the opening. What we do not see is an enormous pile of aluminum debris, broken wings or the tail, bodies, seats or luggage. Remarkably, not even the engines were recovered from the crash site—although a part of a compressor, which was too small to have come from a 757 and too large for a cruise missile—was later reported to have been found. Even more striking to me, however, is this photo of the civilian lime-green fire-trucks as they extinguish the fires:
Since these fire trucks arrived after the crash and spent fifteen minutes or so putting it out, I have been struck by the clear, green, unblemished Pentagon lawn. It looks so smooth, I expect Tiger to appear with his caddy to practice his game. My question, therefore, is, why is there no debris on the lawn?
(5) The planted fuselage
Later, of course, debris would start showing up. Since there was none even as the fire trucks were extinguishing the fires, it has to have come from somewhere. It would have been difficult to have had officers and enlisted men carry pieces of debris out onto the lawn without being observed, so it has occurred to me that perhaps it was dropped from a C-130, which was circling the Pentagon that morning. That’s my best guess. I am open to other possibilities, but I haven’t been able to think of real alternatives. One piece of debris has been used to cement the case for the crash of Flight 77:
One of the oddities about this debris is that it shows no signs of having been exposed to those fireballs and includes a piece of vine. Another student of the Pentagon, James Hanson, a newspaper reporter who earned his law degree from the University of Michigan College of Law, has traced that debris to an American Airlines 757 that crashed in a rain forest above Cali, Columbia in 1995. “It was the kind of slow-speed crash that would have torn off paneling in this fashion, with no fires, leaving them largely intact.” My question is, how did this piece of fuselage wind up on the Pentagon lawn?
(6) The dumpster fires
As though that were not disturbing enough, I was also puzzled why, later in the day, when rumors were circulating that the Capitol might be next and the members of Congress rushed out onto the steps of the building, when they looked across the Potomac, they witnesses billowing black clouds of smoke. That struck me as rather odd, since the lime green fire trucks had put out the modest fires long ago. When I took a closer look, I discovered that these black clouds of smoke were not coming from the Pentagon itself but from a series of enormous dumpsters in front of the building. See what I mean:
When I was still living in Duluth before my retirement in June of 2006, another student of the Pentagon came by and showed me forty-four (44) more frames of the same thing, where you could actually see light between the dumpsters and the building. So my question is, why was it necessary to fake fires coming from the Pentagon if a plane had actually crashed there?
(7) The absence of interest
Since I have been unable to discover the answers to questions like these—where I actually have many more—it has dumbfounded me that nearly ten years after the fact, the mass media, including The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times, CBS, NBC, ABC, and CNN has shown no interest at all in addressing them. Here are three examples of why it seems to me these questions should be burning issues in every major media outlet in this country, where we are confronted only by silence:
Support The Bob Tuskin Radio Show And Your Health!(Ad)
(a) Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, the Co-Chairs of the 9/11 Commission, have long since published WITHOUT PRECEDENT: THE INSIDE STORY OF THE 9/11 COMMISSION (2006), in which they explain their frustration at the lack of cooperation from the administration, citing especially the fact that the Pentagon provided three different accounts of the events of 9/11, not a very reassuring indication that they got everything right. And this report is not from a “conspiracy theorist” but from the co-chairs of the 9/11 inquiry.
(b) A former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State in three administrations, Dr. Steve Pieczenik, has revealed not only that Osama bin Laden actually died on or about 15 December 2001 (as David Ray Griffin, OSAMA BIN LADEN: DEAD OR ALIVE (2009) explained), but that he had been told by a high-ranking general that 9/11 was a “false flag” attack, which was done by the government in order to arouse the American people to support wars of aggression in Afghanistan and Iraq. And this guy earned his Ph.D. at MIT.
(c) And Alan Sabrosky, who earned his Ph.D. at the University of Michigan and is a graduate of the US Army War College, has explained that 9/11 was conceived by neo-cons in and out of the Department of Defense who wanted to advance the proposals of Project for the New American Century by taking advantage of the demise of the Soviet Union to expand the power of the sole remaining superpower by creating an empire around the world, but worried that Americans would not support those wars absent “a new Pearl Harbor”.
Now I cannot claim to know for certain that what we are being told by Lee Hamilton, Thomas Kean, Steve Pieczenik, and Alan Sabrosky is true. I can tell you that it is consistent with my own research and that of others with whom I have been in collaboration since founding Scholars for 9/11 Truth. In case you may think that I am one of those “conspiracy theorists” myself — where I have done a lot of research on JFK as well as on 9/11 — just ask yourself whether my six questions deserve answers and why the American media has been ignoring them in the land of the free and home of the brave!
Jim Fetzer is McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth and maintains a blog about issues of public interest at http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com.
32 Responses to "Inside Job: Seven Questions About 9/11"
Leave a Reply
Popular Articles
The Bob Tuskin Radio Show
- The Bob Tuskin Show - Wednesday, May, 16, 2012
- The Bob Tuskin Show - Tuesday, May, 15, 2012
- The Bob Tuskin Show - Monday, May, 14, 2012
- The Bob Tuskin Show - Friday, May, 11, 2012
- The Bob Tuskin Show - Friday, May, 11, 2012
- The Bob Tuskin Show - Thursday, May, 10, 2012
- The Bob Tuskin Show - Thursday, May, 10, 2012
Hello, Mr. Fetzer
It’s been ten years now, and at least the idea, if not the detailed information has reached most, if not all of the American population. We did our job, and we were successful. Those who still believe our government’s version of the events of 9-11 are beyond reach, and unfortunately for them, beyond hope. They simply refuse to acknowledge our government’s propensity for evil, and all of the scientific proof and documented evidence in the world will not help them see what’s too disturbing for them to know. You’re wasting your time and resources for an increasingly diminishing return on your efforts.
This isn’t bed news. We don’t need these people on our side, and they’ll probably be of little or no assistance even if they do finally accept the truth. The continuing process of trying to disseminate the truth and educate people is what gives you hope, and there’s nothing wrong with that, but the job is done, and it’s time for you to accept what all of this must eventually come to, and prepare for it.
Get off the internet. Organize locally. Don’t make any new friends. Don’t follow leaders.
It is becoming increasingly apparent that the truth of what happened on 9/11 will become known only after the present power structure is overthrown for reasons that more directly affect the lives of ordinary American citizens.
9/11 was an inside job. Even if it would have been some done by some one US claims to be, how can the american public support killing of millions for just 3000 people in WTC! Yet we still here about those 3000 every place but no mention of the millions US has murdered and still doing it. Not to mention the damages to the countries wealth putting them back by 20-30 years then the rest of the world.
Dov Zackheim was burning his books on the lawn.
Or perhaps Doug Feith was roasting marshmallows.
Thank you for your continuing great works Mr. Fetzer. I wasn’t aware of the specific seismic data. Nor was I aware of the work of James Hanson.
I understand there is endless evidence we can cite to destroy the official version and we have to be selective depending on the audience. One nugget I found very interesting was the raw NTSB data which showed the cockpit doors never opening! (Never is not really true, the readings were taken seconds apart, I suppose the hijackers COULD have made a quick entrance and closed the door behind them. Riiiiiight.)
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=18405
Foreknowledge: Mossad agents admitted on Israeli TV “they were there to document the event.”
As opposed to bin Laden’s ‘admission’: I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks…”
I think that we can all say for sure it was a zionist operation, with help from unwitting participants.
To say it was an “inside job” is incomplete, and not fair to the Patriots in our military, intelligence, law enforcement, media, and elected officials. Though I’m painfully aware that number in some sectors is very, very small.
Yours truly,
Rampaging Manatee
If the big news media spent more time on solving this 10 year old crime than covering the Casey Anthony trial and the latest political sex scandal, perhaps this case would have been resolved by now.
On Q2, the plane hitting the building does demonstrate normal observable physics. WTC towers were gigantic structures, with the entire core of building being able to stand up after the perimeter columns and trusses collapsing all around it. Clearly the explosives and nanothermite being present in the core columns is not disputed here.
The law of the conservation of momentum in your article is true. However, it is a false analogy to say a moving building would have acted upon the plane in the same way. The towers were designed to withstand the impact of of a Boeing 747, (i.e. Leslie Robertson) the aluminum, was as observed, shredded by the reinforced steel. You could say the debris should have been visible outside the building, but you have to consider inside the perimeters there are open spaces for offices.
The car crashing into a tree is a false analogy since the materials and properties of a building and a tree are massively different. The masses and velocities considered are significantly different.
Research http://www.journalof911studies.com
There are open letters between Dr. Steven E. Jones & Dr. Fetzer. Although espousing to use logic, (i.e. an appeal to logic) Fetzer often uses makes unsupported assumptions not supported by the scientific method. http://www.journalof911studies.com/letters/JonesRepliesToFetzer.pdf
I thought Columbia’s seismic data had been “lost” somehow. What did I miss?
I can’t believe this was linked on WRH!!
“Professor” Fetzer is a no-planer. This defies reality and I need not say any more.
What do you think would happen when a plane traveling hundreds of miles an hours strikes the exterior of a skyscraper that is partially hollow or weak drywall with glass on the exterior? EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED ON 9/11!!!! Oh I’m sorry Mr. Fetzer. Did I hurt your feelings? Well I don’t care because my comment was censored over at Veterans Today despite telling the truth.
YOU ARE UNDERMINING REAL TRUTH SEEKERS!!!!!
The Pentagon missile/drone thing is all a bunch of BS. You know what hit the pentagon? A 757!!!! You have to suspend rational thought to think otherwise. You have to believe Zionist French website or the LULZY In Plane Site (made by Zionists) to disagree. STOP THE DISINFORMATION!!!
Let’s pretend that a low-flying plane (for testimony purposes) was near the pentagon. A military plane fired a missile. The real flight was destroyed along with it’s passengers and eyewitness testimony (along with air traffic controllers) was all faked. WOULDN’T IT BE EASIER TO CRASH A PLANE INTO IT!!!?! Jeez, don’t be a fool. There goes all your STUPID questions.
Here are some REAL questions
Whats the deal with building 7?
What’s up with Mohamed Atta? If he was a devote Muslim, how come he left a Quran inside a stipper bar aftering getting wasted? Thats kinda forbidden. How come his luggage didn’t make it on the plane and how come he included a list of all the hiajcers in it? How come he misplaced a ‘how to fly’ book in his rental car? How come he cound pronounce “Planes” and “Please” perfectly despite learning English as an adult and being a native Arabic speaker? Arabic has no “P” and he didn’t say “Blanes” or “Blease”. Sounds like a native Hebrew speaker to me.
Which reminds me. How come you or scholars for 9/11 truth never address the Israel connection? The vans with explosives arrested on 9/11. The dancing Israelis blaming Palestinians with their box cutters and Bedouin clothing who were connected to Mossad and appeared on Israeli TV saying they were ‘documenting the event’. How come many Israelis were arrested and deported including fake art students, some of who were doing construction in the WTC?
There are so many valid real questions, attacking a straw man is stupid. The pentagon and Shanksville are irrelevent. Focus on real issues. Don’t believe Zionist disinformationists like Fetzer.
His seismic data is meaningless, who cares? I addressed the plane ‘disappearing’ as you say. The Pentagon, look for evidence elsewhere as there was plenty of debris you troll. the fusealage disintegrated INSIDE THE PENTAGON. Your ‘to scale’ comparison is irrelevant because the plane apporached on an angle. You include a photo with fire truck spray obscuring the damage. This is all propaganda. Truth seekers, disregard this GARBAGE.
haha your funny considering we are NOT no planers at all and Fetzer just asks the question. Why do you want to censor information? Also Bob Tuskin And The Intel Hub has consistently covered the Israeli connection for YEARS!
There’s absolutely no Israeli connection. No plane hit the Pentagon proving Pentagon and Washington brass are 100% responsible. All this Dancing Israeli business is manufactured cointel. Israel was not and does not run the Pentagon or Washington.
Point 2. The notion the jumbo Jet could not enter the building is “no planer”, who claim the event was camera trickery, and is absurd given the video and physical evidence to the contrary.
@Amish
ROFLMAO! Joke of the day!
War by Deception Director’s Cut (911 and Israel)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_d33-Lk5Zbw
Yes well consider that cointel trash film debunked.
.
.
Nelson Rockefeller ordered the towers built when he was NY governor. Nelson went on to be VP under Gerald Ford. The twin towers were even nicknamed after the Rockefeller brothers, Nelson and Jay.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nelson_Rockefeller
Silverstein was leased the towers just prior to the 9/11 event as the fallguy. He was likely in on it and has been in no trouble for his part. He was put on PBS where he famously said “pull it” for the alternative media spin ran by the feds who did 9/11.
Same with the supposed “dancing israelis”. This is just federal created disinfo. We know who did 9/11 – Washington, 100% – not Israel or any Jewish conspiracy.
.
.
Probably the best look at 9/11 evidence is this film:
Zero: An Investigation into 9/11
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2296490368603788739
http://zero911movie.com
absolutely no Israeli connection? WOW that is like saying the sky is red at all times. SHILL
Buildings are hollow, trees are not.
[...] by ImJulianAssange [link] [21 comments] [...]
Great facts!
The truth about 911 is the biggest attacking bomb/strategie to bring the US down. The ones who know the truth and are responsible for this hoax to trigger other wars will reveal it to the sheaple of the world at the time being. The US then will turm into a war zone…US will kill itself. The chosen ones on the side will watch and cheer. My guess a few months from now…..
Some of the posts here worry me. I took a look at the width of the windows
in the Twin Towers, which were 18″ across, and the width of the separation
of the steel columns, which was three meters. There were no windows in
between floors, which means that substantially less than 50% of the side
was made of glass. That means that substantially less than 50% of the
plane should have passed through the windows, not more. Which leaves
more than 50% which should have crumpled, with wings and tail broken
off and bodies, seats, and luggage fallen to the ground. It didn’t happen.
A sure sign that we are viewing video fakery of one kind or another is the
occurrence of impossible events, such as a plane traveling at an impossible
speed, a plane making an impossible entry into a massive building, and a
plane passing through its own length into the building in the same number
of frames it passes through its own length in air. THINK ABOUT IT. That
would be possibly only if a 500,000 ton building poses no more resistance
to the flight of an aircraft than air, which is physical impossibility. So unless
Newton’s three laws were suspended on 9/11, we are viewing faked videos.
I presented six arguments–about the early explosions, about the impossible
entry, about the sizing problem, about the clear Pentagon lawn, about the
planted debris, and about the fires coming from the dumpsters. If you can’t
see that we are dealing with a staged event–where the principal reason for
falling back on video fakery appears to have been to coordinate the “impacts”
with the explosions in the subbasements, as I have explained in this piece,
“9/11: Seismic Proof + Video Fakery = Inside Job”
http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2011/06/911-seismic-proof-video-fakery-inside.html
But there is a huge body of evidence that demonstrates that the whole thing
was staged (from the hijackers to the faked phone calls to the flights to the
demolitions to the Pentagon to Shanksville: GET OVER IT: THE WHOLE OF 9/11
WAS ONE KIND OF FAKERY AFTER ANOTHER. You are willing to confront
the evidence or you are not. I cannot abide those who profess devotion to
9/11 Truth when they are not willing to confront the truth! What kind of a
movement is that? Promote whatever you want to the public but get out of the
way of those of us who are after the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but.
ON WHAT HAPPENED AT THE PENTAGON:
“What Didn’t Happen at the Pentagon”
http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2010/01/what-didnt-happen-at-pentagon.html
“Pandora’s Black Box, Chapter 2″
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8672066571196607580#
Flight Data Expert Confirmation: No Evidence Linking FDR Data to American77
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/Dennis-Cimino-AA77-FDR.html
ON PLANES OR NO PLANES:
Elias Davidsson, “There is no evidence that Muslims committed the crime of 9/11″
http://www.opednews.com/articles/There-is-no-evidence-that-by-Elias-Davidsson-100811-366.html
David Ray Griffin, “Phone Calls from the 9/11 Airliners”
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=16924
Leslie Raphael, “Jules Naudet’s 9/11 Film was Staged”
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/naudet/raphael.htm
“New Proof of Video Fakery on 9/11″
http://www.opednews.com/articles/New-Proof-of-Video-Fakery–by-Jim-Fetzer-080729-132.html
“9/11: Speeds Reported For World Trade Center Attack Aircraft Analyzed”
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/wtc_speed
Killtown on Shanksville,
http://killtown.blogspot.com/2010/10/guest-on-real-deal-with-jim-fetzer-mon.html
And just because some of us are able to follow logic and evidence where it
leads farther than others does not mean some of us are shills or ops. The
conditions for convergence of opinion between investigators depends upon
their study of the same range of alternative hypotheses, the same body of
evidence, and reliance upon the same rules of reasoning–which is obviously
not the case here. Those who won’t even look at evidence of video fakery
are prime examples. So stop worrying because some of us study aspects of
the case that are difficult or even impossible for others to address–and
keep searching for and promoting the truth. THAT IS OUR COMMON GOAL.
Jim
I am not closed to the idea that 9/11 was an inside job. However, I’d really appreciate it if someone could explain to me how the Muslim terrorists factor fits in. At first I ridiculed the idea that 9/11 was an inside job finding the pictures of what might be military planes ludicrous, but as I have come to know more about the Bush administration and George W in particular and his ties to Freemasonry and the Illuminati my belief and perception of this issue has modified since the time it happened and while I detest the Democrats and all socialists I now realise it is quite possible that some of the Republican and other conservative politicians are not above selling out to the globalists.
So I would be grateful, honestly grateful if someone could explain to me how the Muslim terrorists fit into the equation because I know the Islamic agenda to destroy the West including both our countries (Australia & America) and establish a global caliphate.
Ian, what Islamic agenda to destroy the west, do you know of ? Perhaps a couple of idiots who say they are muslims rant and rave about something like that but for all these years, muslims did nothing against the west and now they make their move? No son, if your eyes opened a bit, go the whole way. Albert Pike, father of freemasonry stated the need for division via the 2 world wars, THEN a third against the muslims or china. Muslims don’t need to take over the west, when people read the Quran and the LITERAL words of God (Allah – THE God, no partner has He, no gender, no plurality {Al-Lah in arabic – the word itself – does not have gender nor plurality}), THEN will many learn the Truth about the fact that Satan and devils live in our minds, whispering and enticing us towards sex and inhumanity (id, ego) and why we must show restraint. Words alone aren’t good enough.
Thus islam, submitting to God by prayer (control), charity (fighting greed and injustice) avoiding usury (injustice), fasting to get strength are all His methods as a test for those who are patient in this world. Where did interest and credit get us? What’s happening to our morality under the zionist led world media and entertainment industry, the porn, the indifference to the poor? The idolatry we practice – mother nature, if the gods have it…, astrology controlling us.., worshiping sports, movie stars and others? No ian, the west’s satanic methods are failing mankind, islam has the answers, like it or not – like medicine you have to drink. Read the Quran and IF you are humble, see what happens in your heart. God may or may not allow it to be moved. Insha Allah – if God wills it.
Surah 110:
1. When the Victory of Allah cometh and all the doors are opened.
2. And you see the people embracing Islam in multitudes.
3. Then exalt all praise of your Lord and ask for His forgiveness. Indeed, He is ever Accepting of (anyone’s) repentance.
God is telling us that people are embracing it….it happened since the prophet’s time and will happen until the end of time, as the Quran is the final revelation, Islam the last religion. There are no more prophets, no other religion after this. Hasn’t been for over 1400years.
God knows best. Peace.
[...] Read the original post: Inside Job: Seven Questions About 9/11 | BobTuskin.com [...]
[...] Remarkably, not even the engines were recovered from the crash site’although a part of a compressor, which was too small to have come from a 757 and too large for a cruise missile’was later reported to have been found. Even more striking to me, however, is this photo of the civilian lime-green fire-trucks as they extinguish the fires:. Read more on Inside Job [...]
This is disinfo! Every single point!
I too am disappointed that WRH has linked to this drivel, and in the Intel Hub for giving this misdirection a platform.
The ‘Jewish state’, dual-citizen Jews in the US gov’t and a few of their paid Goyish stooges pulled off the FALSE-FLAG attacks on 9/11.
Period. Anyone saying otherwise is a LIAR or a FOOL. Either way they don’t deserve a platform to spread their nonsense.
’9/11 Missing Links’ is the only film about that day that people need to see.
http://www.911missinglinks.com/
Click on ‘Watch Movie’ at link above.
NO MORE LIES!
As for Mr. Felcher’s Seven Lies…
1. This is the least offensive to the truth (which is probably why he led off w/ it) but it’s still a little misleading because 14 and 17 seconds is almost a negligible difference. If there were huge bombs in the basements of the towers – they were likely Israeli truck/van bombs. This is what the evidence shows.
At least 4 other vanloads of Israelis were arrested that day. One had traces of explosives (the one with the ‘Five Dancing Israelis’ – Google it), one had actual explosives, one actually EXPLODED after it was pulled over, and one had a mural painted on the side depicting a plane diving into NYC. Also Google ‘Urban Moving Systems’.
So if there were explosions, the other evidence from that day suggests that their source was the same as the above explosives discovered that day: Israeli Jewish agents!
2. As has been pointed out – trees are solid. The twins were virtually hollow (you know – the space where the offices and people were). How much does a 767 weigh? Oh, about 400,000 (four hundred thousand) lbs.
How fast were the planes going at impact? Oh, about 550 mph… Do the math and you’ll see that this mass traveling at this velocity would have no problem slicing through the 1/2″ (half-inch) thick box-tube perimeter columns.
As for the wings & why they didn’t fall off in the street… Well the wings are where the fuel is stored! Each wing weighs about 100,000 (one hundred thousand) lbs! So 200,000 lbs of wing traveling at over 500 mph would also have EASILY sliced through the perimeter columns of the twins.
3. The Pentagon security cam footage is seen through a fisheye lens. This distorts the image and like the rear-view mirrors on your car – makes it appear smaller.
A video which demonstrates this (and the whole crash) visually:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVDdjLQkUV8&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Flittlegreenfootballs.com%2Fweblog%2F%3FPHPSESSID%3Da2bd4f2bd9c5a890ba6fedb5a4cb7f4a
Enough with the ‘No Plane’ nonsense already damnit!
4. Selectively showing far off photos with no debris only proves that you’ve avoided the dozens and dozens of photos which DO show debris. Even the second photo provided DOES show debris strewn all over! And if the plane was traveling North at over 500 mph – then why would you expect to see debris to the South? Conservation of momentum says most of the debris would also continue Northward.
Mr. Felcher admits that the plane hit the ground floor but lies about the size of the impact hole saying it was less than 20′ wide! This is pure BS!
Here are a couple of clear shots of the more than 100′ (one hundred+ foot) hole in the Pentagon:
http://christconquers.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/thisis100ft1.jpg
http://christconquers.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/pentagon-100-hole1.jpg
The 20′ wide hole is on the 2nd floor and was made by the tail section.
5. This is ridiculous. It’s really not even worth a response.
The debris was dropped from a plane?
10 Ha Ha Ha
20 goto 10
Run
6. The garbage dumpsters are on fire… I wonder if the 20,000 gallons/200,000 lbs of flaming kerosene had anything to do with that?
Also ridiculous. This is disinfo! Stop it!
7. And you wonder why no one is interested in this BUNK?
You’re giving 9/11 truth a bad name… You’re making us all look stupid.
You better stop it! Enough!!
Regarding question #2: Most respondents have overlooked the bright flashes immediately preceding both planes exterior entry into each tower. Given the advanced materials, tight events coordination, and extensive organization and pre-planning involved, I would surmise a connection between an “impossible” entry and an advanced means of momentarily weakening the outer steel framework. The inside of both entry points are already under suspicion for other reasons and could have hosted additional components used for this.
The extensive preparation and comprehensive methodologies used to pull this scam off would suggest the fruits of ordinance and weapons research were involved and utilized. Secret research would produce such materiel and expose it to just those most apt to have employed same in these events.
Reply to James Fetzer Over No Plane Nonsense
http://weeklyintercept.blogspot.com/2011/07/reply-to-fetzer-over-no-plane-nonsense.html
[...] Seven (STUPID) Questions About 9/11 [...]
I believe a 747 punching into the ground floor of a building would be difficult without the engines hitting the lawn. Also six tons of engine might be expected to either punch holes in the building or bounce off. In which case where are they in the photos? No holes no engines. But there is a picture of one hole in the inner ring of the building. If one thing sums up the whole thing it is that nothing adds up.
Wow everyone who believes this junk is pathetic. But you won’t admit it, ever, because the mechanics of conspiracy theories are designed to make anyone disagreeing part of the conspiracy – the enemy- it’s exactly how religion works. and by denying 9/11 was an attack you’re defending a bunch of backward religious zealots who killed 3000 people because god told them to.
i chose my user name as a way to mock all you antisemitic fucks. If you weren’t mentally disabled i wouldn’t have to explain it. So go on wearing your tin foil hats and buying your gold. (By the way gold is just like money – it’s value is only what we perceive it to be- in other words if the there’s an “economic collapse” gold is about as valuable as a dick on the pope. so better invest in live stock and gasoline before the jews -sorry, the “Zionist Entity” come to get your guns…….morons)
I think that to get the personal loans from creditors you must have a firm reason. But, one time I have received a bank loan, just because I was willing to buy a bike.
[...] http://www.commondreams.org/further/2011/06/28-0 http://www.bobtuskin.com/2011/07/05/inside-job-seven-questions-about-911/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dvIv0CvDM0&feature=player_embedded [...]
get it over with people with the speeds announced by gov,boeing personal+airline pilots laught there ass off when hearing your comments:MAX speed of 757 :360 knots…500 mph at sea lvel is just a s stupid as you comments,a plane do not pulverise a building that size,you are jokers-cochonouse….let’s not even mention the pentagon….which is even more a joke,armored piercing carbon fiber airliners,HAHAHAHAHOUHOU::::.