Show Archives

Photobucket

Listen Live And Chat

Photobucket

About

Photobucket

Five False Predictions of the AIDS Establishment

Commentary // Jul 8 2011

Liam Scheff

1. We’re All At Risk:

 

In 1987, the fear-and-death hyperbole machine that is the engine of ‘public health’ pandemania was in such ferocious motion, that Oprah Winfrey issued this warning:

 

“Research studies now project that one in five – listen to me, hard to believe – one in five heterosexuals could be dead from AIDS at the end of the next three years. That’s by 1990. One in five.” Although Americans have grown larger, not thinner, Oprah has never apologized for her wild-eyed hyperbole. But the mainstream has, issuing warnings in the press that “the threat of a global heterosexual pandemic has disappeared,” and that worldwide AIDS numbers are over-inflated, needing to be halved or more, because the AIDS public relations machine has created a “House of Numbers.”

 

2. AIDS is an Incurable Disease:

 

AIDS is, in fact, what it always was – a variety of different illnesses manifesting very differently in different people and populations. It’s been no ‘one size fits all’ diagnosis. It has proven best-treatable by a multilateral approach – a combination of nutritional, pharmaceutical, and lifestyle interventions which have done best to leave the harder, sanctified “AIDS Drugs” behind. Notably, those who jumped on the FDA-approved bandwagon, with high-dose AZT, or those who “hit early and hit hard” with drug “cocktails,” died fastest, and died horribly, poisoned by the pharmaceutical establishment.

 

3. AIDS Is a Sexually Transmitted Disease:

 

From 1987 to 1997, a team of researchers in Northern California at the University of California, Berkeley, conducted the longest study on heterosexual transmission on record. They studied 175 sexually-active long-term couples, one person in each twosome testing HIV positive, one HIV negative. The pairs entered the study having every kind of sex imaginable, up, down, front and back, with a majority not using condoms.

Over six years, they were encouraged to use latex, but a large percentage continue not to. The results?

 

At the end of the study, of the 175 negative partners, a very low number had converted from HIV negative to HIV positive, despite regular sexual exposure to their positive partner. A very low number, indeed….In fact, the number was so low, that Wikipedia, the guardian of all populist junk science, has censored “The Padian Study,” as it’s known, from its “AIDS” and “HIV” pages. The number? Zero. No one, nobody, not a single person who tested negative became positive, despite years of sex with a positive partner. This is a heck of a thing for a presumed “STD,” and has more to do with the realities of HIV testing than the mainstream cares to admit…

 

 

4. HIV Testing Stops the Spread of AIDS:

 

“AIDS” has, through the constant loosening of official definitions and expansion of symptoms and illnesses, been turned into a brand-name worldwide for any disease of poverty, drug abuse, pharmaceutical poisoning or environmental intoxication. “AIDS” functions as a blanket term laid heavily on the backs of limited but massive populations, mostly in Africa, who suffer endemic poverty, and all that accompany it – dangerously polluted water, no food, and chronic bacterial and parasitic infection. But the AIDS industry has not stopped the call for more and more toxic drugs, given to people who don’t even have enough food to keep down, or clean water to swallow with. These are the very people who are considered “at risk” for AIDS, therefore they are most heavily targeted for HIV testing internationally. “AIDS” prefigures HIV testing, and HIV testing is problematic…

 

5. HIV Tests are Ethical and Accurate, and Everybody Should Take One:

 

The medical literature accumulated over 25 years of antibody and genetic testing “for HIV” have revealed that HIV tests are good at one thing: Testing for every disease, non-disease, medical condition and non-medical condition on the planet. These tests come up positive for flu vaccination, alcoholism, drug use, parasitic infection and pregnancy; for “reasons that are unclear,” and for cross-reaction with the materials in the test kit themselves. After 25 years, the tests still have “no gold reference standard,” that is, they refer to no particular particle, and they find no particular set of antibodies or genetic material, despite the massive public relations of the pharma-machine that has grown in South Africa and North America to promote their use. HIV tests, in a word, stink. They’re unethical, they give a death sentence without cause, and because they are targeted at populations assumed to have “AIDS,” they CAUSE the spread of “HIV,” by giving false results to populations already in crisis.

 

But despite these insurmountable failures, the AIDS machine rages on, waging war on critics and patients alike.

Visit his website LiamScheff.com is an independent investigator and journalist who broke the story of government/pharma drug trials in New York orphans with toxic AIDS drugs.

3 Responses to "Five False Predictions of the AIDS Establishment"

  1. Dean Jackson July 8, 2011 6:40 pm Reply

    Or one can familiarize oneself with the man who started questioning the HIV causes AIDS hypothesis back in the early 1980s (Dr. Peter Duesberg, professor of Molecular and Cell Biology at the University of California, Berkeley):

    http://www.duesberg.com/index.html

    Duesberg was the first to alert the molecular and cell biology scientific community that there were no controlled studies that accepted the HIV causes AIDS hypothesis, and that the evidence actually supported that the HIV virus was simply a piggyback disease that would naturally be found in depressed immune systems. In other words, the molecular and cell biology scientific community were committing the most basic of statistical errors that students of Statistics 101 are warned of, that being: Statistical Confounding. ‘Correlation is not causation’, in other words.

  2. Paddy O'Gorman July 15, 2011 4:38 am Reply

    Thanks for this summary. Aids isn’t just a massive failiure of medical science, it’s been a massive failirure of journalism too. Instead of doing its job, that is, telling the public the facts, the media has instead been co-opted into a campaign to “save lives”. As a result we (I’m a broadcaster) have agreed on a set of parameters from the start that excludes the truth and instead has caused us to spread myths. Myth no 1, that there is a new equal-opportunity venereal disease spreading among us;, myth no 2, we in the West have, however, been largely saved by “wonder-drugs; and myth no 3 (the most pernicious of all), this same venereal disease is devastating Africa because Africans are far more sexually active than us westerners.

    When the history of the Aids era comes to be written, it will be seen as having been, in the media, the ultimate trumph of spin over substance.

    Paddy O’Gorman
    RTE
    Dublin

  3. Marcellus Chuene August 13, 2011 8:53 am Reply

    I do admit that there are inconsistencies and contradictions in the AIDS/HIV nexus but I am concerned as a citizen of the allegedly hard hit region by AIDS,Sub-Sahara Africa.I see many people dying in their prime.I have heard about HIV discordance in couples but the AIDS establishment has not satisfactorily explained this phenomena.What could be behind this AIDS/HIV campaign?Is it profits or neocolonialism disguised as a plague?Dr Luc Montaigner says a healthy immune system can wipe out HIV within weeks.The media,in cahoot with the parmaceutical companies say Dr Montaigner is a co-discoverer and omit the fact that Dr Gallo fraudelently used samples sent to him by Dr MontaignerThey dont mention the fact that he won a Nobel prize for discovering HIV because AIDS make profits and reduce population growth in developing countries.They deliberately marginalise him and discuss his views in hushed tones to keep profits rolling.He visited Mozambique recently and this conference was held behind closed doors and the media only mentioned it in passing,for a man who discovered HIV,why?Both the orthodox and unorythodox views are holding us at ransome.I dont know who to believe.Some say HIV was never isolated,some say it was isolated.Something is very wrong as it seems there is a conspiracy against Africans and Blacks in particular.Tell Dr montaigner to tell us about the co-factors in AIDS.Why is proffessor Duesberg so quiet these days?Has he converted and why AIDS denialists are mostly people without medical training?

Freeze Dried Food

survival seed vault

Leave a Reply