Bob's Youtube

1watch

Listen Live And Chat

1livechat

About

1about

Highly Toxic Mercury Present in Processed Foods, Yet FDA Does Nothing

Commentary, News // Dec 17 2011

By Anthony Gucciardi
Activist Post

Why has the FDA ignored the fact that mercury, an element that is highly toxic in all forms, was found in a large number of brand-name processed foods?

Specifically, the mercury content was found to be contained in high-fructose corn syrup, which also reportedly contains genetically modified ingredients.

Instead of addressing this major public health concern, the FDA is focusing their time on crushing beneficial supplements through ridiculous NDI regulations that threaten the entire infrastructure of the nutraceuticals industry.

Researchers from two U.S. studies reported that about half of tested samples of high-fructose corn syrup contained mercury. Mercury was also found in nearly a third of 55 popular brand-name food and beverage products which listed high-fructose corn syrup as the first-or-second-highest labeled ingredient.

Following the report, organizations like the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy called on the FDA for immediate action:

‘Mercury is toxic in all its forms. Given how much high-fructose corn syrup is consumed by children, it could be a significant additional source of mercury never before considered. We are calling for immediate changes by industry and the [U.S. Food and Drug Administration] to help stop this avoidable mercury contamination of the food supply,”’the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy’s Dr. David Wallinga, a co-author of both studies, said in a prepared statement.

Americans Consumed Over 37 Pounds of Mercury-Laden HFCS in 2008

Mercury is toxic in any dosage, but the information becomes even more alarming when you consider the fact that the average American consumed 37.8 pounds of high-fructose corn syrup in 2008! If this is not explosive enough on its own, remember the fact that this is but one source of mercury exposure. CFL light bulbs, mercury-contaminated seafood, and some dental fillings are a few sources of mercury exposure that affect millions of individuals.

Read more:  http://www.activistpost.com/2011/12/highly-toxic-mercury-present-in.html

[GARD]

One Response to "Highly Toxic Mercury Present in Processed Foods, Yet FDA Does Nothing"

  1. 2458 January 4, 2012 3:23 pm Reply

    Food is extensively used in many countries, especially in the UK, as a weapon against selected targets. The methods are many, and the majority of them are based on two principles, namely ‘coherence’ and ‘naturality’. The coherence principle provides for using various sources to add up reaching certain level of operational impact. The naturality principle serves to disguise malicious intentions of the operatives by using substances which are either not traceable after certain time, e.g.radioactive substances, or naturally occur, or are permitted to be used in so called safe quantities as a constituent substances of the products with no restrictions on distribution.

    Now, these principles combine with certain socio, legal and political features of a particular state. Thus, in majority of the Western countries the real power belongs to the various sorts of secret societies which unify people from different professional layers, including those from supermarkets. As far as I understand, they are trained in psychic powers and widely use psychotronic equipment to paralise the will and power of judgement of thier victims and use the predisposition of the targets to their advantage, and their belonging to the secret society enables them to perform required coherent actions!

    By way of illustration, let us consider murcury poisoning. It is well known chemical wich is used in dentistry. So, certain level of murcury in your body can be accounted by this reason. Therefore, systematic poisoning of the target by murcury is impossible to be linked with malicious intentions unless you have a lot of money for very fine expertise. Any application of this poison , as any other, of course, is preceeded by thorough observations of the victim’s preferences and the modes of behaviour. If the target is of limited income (if not, he or she can be reduced to the state of limited income), it is very easy to hand him or her discounted food in the supermarket wich is tainted. Let us say, somebody is regularly bying cooked turkey in Saisburies, Gloucester Road, London, while living in Belvedere House, which is officially a nearby hostel for working people, but in fact is a place of residence for police informants, intelligence operatives, criminals and masons. So, the target is known to be friendly with some people dwelling their. It can be easy to organise a conversation there, and a discounted turkey is mentioned during the conversation. On next visit to the Sainsbury’s , the target will find heavily discounted turkey on sale. He or she stops near the turkey, hesitating whether to bye it. Suddenly, a cock runs to the display and grabs another turkey. So, the target would very likely grab the turkey as well on the bases of ‘click-response’ reflex. Of course, the turkey is not good, but it would be impossible to prove any malicious intention in the British Courts which members also belong to the secret societies.

    Now, the effect of food will be enhanced by application of cleaning substances containing murcury and widely used in the hostel. After that, the person is irradiated during the night by electromagnetic radiation or ultrasound to forget the details of what happened, and he or she will be subjected later on to the same tricks, but in slightly differing surcumstances. Cheer up! By the way, do not visit any supermarket more often then once a week!



Leave a Reply